Annotated Scenarios
The PRISMATIC team developed a set of ethical scenarios related to the inclusion of LGBTQIA+ participants in higher education STEM education research, and provide information for people who want to use these scenarios in their own professional development settings (suggested resources and potential responses to the scenario). These scenarios are not meant to encompass all potential ethical situations, instead reflecting the ethical dilemmas encountered by PRISMATIC participants and leaders in conducting STEM education research in higher education in the United States.
Workshops
Workshop Overview:
In this interactive workshop, we first describe the context of our work. Second, we discuss best practices and considerations for conceptualizing, designing, conducting, and disseminating higher education research involving LGBTQIA+ participants in STEM education by engaging with materials from our professional development module, developed in 2024 and tested in 2025. We engage our audience in an exploration and discussion of resources developed through PRISMATIC, including critical questions to ask, recommendations for researchers, and scenarios of research situations (informed by real experiences) that raise significant ethical concerns. We emphasize areas of caution or tension and discuss evidence-based responses and suggestions for future research.
Workshop Audience:
This workshop is for education researchers and instructors to ensure that research with LGBQTIA+ individuals meets the most ethical and responsible standards, for graduate and undergraduate students who may participate in such research, and for those who review proposals and journal articles involving such research. This workshop is also for members of Institutional Review Boards.
Typical Workshop Structure:
The initial introduction of the workshop will provide context to the audience members about PRISMATIC, the goals of the community, and the outcomes of the workshops, hybrid conference, and subsequent module development and testing. The presenters will also generally introduce the freely available toolkit to help guide researchers through ethical considerations. After that, audience engagement will be paramount to the workshop. Audience members will work in small groups to talk through a number of scenarios provided by the presenters and available with the toolkit. These scenarios include a variety of issues researchers may encounter, including questions of overall research design, theoretical framework, funding issues, data collection concerns, and dissemination. Audience members will have the opportunity to talk through multiple scenarios, after which there will be time for groups to share out. Next, presenters and audience members will collectively walk through a scenario using the toolkit and consider the questions asked in the toolkit to make decisions for the scenario. The final portion of the workshop will have participants return to their small groups and address a situation one or more of the members may be facing in their own research, and the presenters will circulate the room to engage with each table [or visit Zoom breakout rooms for online workshops], answering questions about the toolkit or the situations participants describe. The remainder of the workshop will allow for general audience questions.
Community Agreements for Workshop Participants include:
- We are here to learn from each other through discussions about ethical research considerations involving LGBTQIA+ communities.
- We are not here to debate the legitimacy of LGBTQIA+ individuals and their identities, nor the need for vigilance and intentionality for the ethical inclusion of LGBTQIA+ individuals in STEM education research.
- Verbal or written harassment or aggressions will lead to individuals being removed from this workshop.
Workshop Options:
It takes time to learn new information, so we recommend longer workshops to provide more time for participant engagement and interaction. However, through our piloting, we have tested three different lengths (3 hours, 1.5 hours, 1 hour) and can tailor the workshop to fit the time available. We piloted the workshop in online, hybrid, and in-person settings, and can offer the workshop in any of these formats.
3 hour Workshop Sample Schedule
- 5 minute reflection: prior knowledge about queer students in stem
- 15 minutes: welcome, introductions, & community agreements
- 10 minutes: orienting activity
- 10 minutes: definitions and terminology
- 25 minutes: small group activity: ethical scenario discussion round 1
- Participants select one of 3 scenarios to discuss for 20 minutes, followed by 5 minutes for full group share out
- 10 minutes: research ethics issues
- 15 minutes Break
- 25 minutes: small group activity: ethical scenarios discussion round 2
- Participants select one of 3 scenarios to discuss for 20 minutes, followed by 5 minutes for full group share out
- 5 minute reflection: free write applying new thoughts to existing research
- 25 minutes: small group activity: creating additional scenarios
- 15 minutes: full group questions and reflections
90 minute Workshop Sample Schedule
- 15 minute introduction to PRISMATIC resources and this workshop
- 5 minutes to talk about the toolkit, including critical questions to ask yourself when designing/enacting a study and recommendations for researchers, which will include audience engagement
- 20 minutes small group discussions of ethical research scenarios (round 1)
- Participants select one of 3 scenarios to discuss for 15 minutes, followed by 5 minutes for full group share out
- 10 minutes to navigate through the toolkit with one scenario as an example
- 20 minutes small group discussion of ethical research scenarios (round 2)
- Participants select one of 3 scenarios to discuss for 15 minutes, followed by 5 minutes for full group share out
- 20 minutes for full group questions and reflections
60 minute Workshop Sample Schedule
- 15 minute introduction to PRISMATIC resources and this workshop
- 5 minutes to talk about the toolkit, including critical questions to ask yourself when designing/enacting a study and recommendations for researchers, which will include audience engagement
- 20 minutes small group discussions of ethical research scenarios (round 1)
- Participants select one of 3 scenarios to discuss for 15 minutes, followed by 5 minutes for full group share out
- 10 minutes to navigate through the toolkit with one scenario as an example
- 10 minutes for full group questions and reflections
Workshop Fees
Please contact us [scimath@unl.edu] to discuss specific fees for your situation. The workshop fees depend on the duration and format of the requested workshop, as well as your anticipated attendance. Our typical fee structure is to have one presenter per 15-20 attendees, $250 per presenter per hour (which includes both the workshop time plus a 30-60 minute meeting with you to discuss particulars and your context/audience and 1-2 hours to tailor the workshop to your context/audience). In-person and hybrid workshop fees will additionally include presenter travel costs.
Annotated Resources
We provide a set of annotated resources. The PRISMATIC team and participants identified a number of resources related to the ethical inclusion of LGBTQIA+ participants in higher education STEM education research, and provide additional annotations for those materials. These resources are not meant to be all encompassing, but represent resources identified by our used by the PRISMATIC participants and leadership team members. To suggest additional resources we could add here, please contact scimath@unl.edu
Sex and Gender Equity in Research: Rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use
Heidari, S., Babor, T.F., De Castro, P. et al.
Publication Date: 2016
Resource Type: Journal Article
SAGER guidelines for reporting gender and sex in peer-reviewed journals. This is a biomedical research piece that can be useful information for people who are inappropriately conflating sex and gender, but it is not about LGBTQIA+ populations.
Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Sex Characteristics Subcommittee
Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology
Publication Date: Accessed 9/27/2024
Resource Type: Research working group website
The Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Sex Characteristics (SOGISC) Subcommittee promotes coordination between federal agencies on issues relating to measuring sexual orientation and gender identity in federal data collections.
The SOGISC Subcommittee advises the FCSM and the Interagency Council on Statistical Policy (ICSP) on SOGISC measurement issues, provides technical assistance as needed across Federal agencies on SOGISC measurement issues, and oversees meetings of the FCSM Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Sex Characteristics (SOGISC) Interest Group.
Measuring Sex, Gender Identity, and Sexual Orientation for the National Institutes of Health
National Academies of Science Engineering and Medicine
Publication Date: 2022
Resource Type: Report
"Sex, gender, and sexual orientation are core aspects of identity that shape opportunities, experiences with discrimination, and outcomes through the life course; therefore, it is crucial that measures of these concepts accurately capture their complexity....The committee’s report offers principles for data collection, guidelines for collecting sex and gender data, and criteria for selecting recommended measures for sexual orientation identity." Issue briefs are detailed but specific, full document is helpful but extensive and detailed and also notes it is not necessarily up to date because newer terms haven't been verified.
Ready, Set, Go: a Guide for Collecting Data on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
National LGBTQ+ Health Education Center
Publication Date: 2022
Resource Type: How to guide
Healthcare specific- "This guide was designed to help health centers and other health care organizations successfully collect sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data and document the data into the electronic health record (EHR)"
Challenges to Doing Research on LGBTQ Issues in Education and Important Research Needs
George L. Wimberly and Juan Battle
Publication Date: 2015
Resource Type: Book chapter
"This chapter addresses some of the prevailing research challenges that have inhibited effective and rigorous studies on LGBTQ issues in education research. The political climate may produce challenges to conducting studies on topics about sexuality in schools. Also, research funding and support and the status hierarchies among academic publications may limit where and how studies are undertaken and disseminated. This chapter examines some of these challenges and offers recommendations to encourage further studies on LGBTQ issues and to support knowledge production in this area." (From chapter's abstract)
Sex, Gender, and Sexuality
National Institutes of Health
Publication Date: 2023
Resource Type: Glossary
This is fairly limited in scope but does provide a clear source, creates a shared set of terms based on an authoritative source (AP Stylebook) and gives date.
Updates on Terminology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Survey Measures
Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology
Publication Date: August 2020
Resource Type: Report
It is a longer resource that covers more of the history of SOGI questions with the intention “to inform researchers and interested parties beyond the U.S. federal statistical system” (p. 1) and has a focus on “those who might be a sexual and/or gender minority and do no see a response with which they identify.” (p. 2). This is not a resource for cut & paste survey items but rather a resource to build a research backed understanding of question development.
How to Collect Data About LGBT Communities
Baker, K; Durso, L; Ridings, A.; Center for American Progress Website
Publication Date: March 2016
Resource Type: Fact sheet
This is overall a very user-friendly resource that provides explicit examples of types of questions you may want to ask in a survey. It also talks about what language was currently inappropriate and why standalone “What is your sex?” questions should not be used. The authors have assembled a helpful fact sheet with an overview of how to collect "more and better data about sexual orientation and gender identity, or SOGI," which they argue is "essential to meet the needs of LGBT people and their families across the United States."
Considerations for Conducting Sensitive Research with the LGBTQIA+ Communities
Clifford Lewis & Nina Reynolds
Publication Date: 2021
Resource Type: Journal article
"Focusing on the notions of respect and beneficence underlining ethical research practice, this research note explains the heterogeneity inherent in the LGBTQIA+ acronym and draws implications for research practice. The article concludes by putting forward some considerations, focusing on the researcher, the research project, and the participant; to help market researchers when conducting research with LGBTQIA+ people." (From journal abstract)
Research Ethics with Gender and Sexually Diverse Persons
Mark Henrickson, Sulaimon Giwa, Trish Hafford-Letchfield, Christine Cocker, Nick J. Mulé, Jason Schaub, and Alexandre Baril
Publication Date: 2020
Resource Type: Journal Article
The goal of the article is to suggest ways to address ethical challenges raised by work into gender and sexually diverse communities with a target audience of cisgender and heterosexual researchers, researchers looking at general populations, sexually diverse researchers, and human ethics committees. The authors encourage reflection about how western discourses may not translate across cultures and how the choice of language used in dissemination of work should be explained. Furthermore, the authors provide 12 guiding principles for researchers and ethic committees.